Home About Us Your Rights Equal Pay Family and Medical Leave Glass Ceiling Phenomenon Monetary Relief Pregnancy Discrimination Retaliation Sex Plus Sex Stereotyping Sexual Harassment Sexual Orientation/Identity Domestic Violence Severance Client Kudos Media Center Blog Don't Quit Links Internships FAQs Contact Us

Sexual Harassment

Sexual harassment in the workplace

occurs whenever there is an unwanted

condition imposed on a person's

employment because of that person's

gender.  Sexual harassment typically

involves a woman being subjected to one

or more of the following actions:

* unwelcome sexual advances;

* acts of gender-based hostility due to the recipient's sex;

* a workplace environment or pervasive conduct that is offensive on the basis

of gender to other employees, regardless of whether or not they are specifically

targeted for harassment.

The law in this area is ever-evolving and there are many distinctions and

intricacies that need to be considered regarding the advancement of women in

the workplace and the continuing bias and disparate treatment that women

continue to suffer.  Some considerations are:

* the response of the employer to internal complaints;

* the existing policies, procedures and training of management with respect

to charges of harassment.

Every case requires an independent analysis of all the factors.  Having said that,

there are still two basic legal theories of sexual harassment allegations, "quid

pro quo" and "hostile environment." "Quid pro quo," literally "something for

something," essentially connotes that an individual is forced to choose between

suffering an adverse employment action, e.g., getting fired, and submitting to

sexual demands.  To paraphrase Andrea Dworkin, it is like being forced to

choose between abject humiliation and inflicting self-injury.

The hostile work environment theory requires that a plaintiff demonstrate the

following elements in her basic claim:

* that she is a member of a protected class (women);

* that she was subjected to unwelcome sexual harassment;

* the harassment was based on sex;

* the harassment affected a term, condition or privilege of employment (the

conduct must be severe and pervasive);

* the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to

take prompt and effective remedial action (the employer did nothing at all, or

did too little, too late or simply made matters worse).

While sexual harassment can afflict members of either gender, as a practical

matter, the vast majority of cases implicate men in positions of authority seeking

some form of sexual gratification at the expense of a subordinate female

employee, or men in a traditionally male bastion of labor creating an

environment where women are made to feel diminished and humiliated.  While

the strength of an individual case can only be properly assessed during a

personal consultation with a qualified attorney, one knows when she is

experiencing discomfort at work as a consequence of sexually-charged activity

or conduct.  If this is true for you, find your company's sexual harassment policy

or employee handbook and seek the advice of a Plaintiff's employment lawyer as

soon as possible.

 

Contact Us

120 Broadway, 18th Floor

New York, New York 10271

United States

Phone: 212.766.9100

Toll Free: 866.FEM.LAWS

info@womensrightsny.com

 

On October 1, 2007, Jack Tuckner talks about

sexual harassment and the ramifications of the

Browne-Sanders sexual harassment and retaliation

verdict against Isaiah Thomas and the New York

Knicks with Senior Legal Correspondent Jim Avila

on ABC’s World News Tonight